Repeatability vs. reproducibility, which should you use? Repeatability and reproducibility are two ways that scientists and engineers measure the precision of their experiments and measuring tools.

A key facet of scientific methodology is reproducibility. Essentially, good science should be easily reproduced with the same methodology in a different setting. Ten years ago, Nature published an ...

This story originally appeared on Undark and is part of the Climate Desk collaboration.. David Randall and Christopher Welser are unlikely authorities on the reproducibility crisis in science ...

Reproducibility outside of science: In contrast to a number of other questions, in the case of reproducibility, the engineers were far more stringent than the scientists.

The Reproducibility Project, which was years in the making, assessed studies that had been published in 2008. Many psychologists I’ve spoken to think their field is much better now.

Reproducibility is one of the buzziest terms in science today. After all, science by its nature is not supposed to be a one-and-done affair. But a new paper in Science Translational Medicine ...

Social science, including behavioral economics, has recently come under fire as failing to generate studies with reproducible results. The Reproducibility Project made waves in August of 2015 when ...

Researchers assessed more than 1,000 results from fruit-fly immunity research published between 1959 and 2011. The majority ...

Reproducibility: Obtaining consistent computational results using the same input data, computational steps, methods, code, and conditions of analysis. Also called computational reproducibility.

Science's Reproducibility Problem: 100 Psych Studies Were Tested and Only Half Held Up. Published Aug 28, 2015 at 3:05 PM EDT Updated Apr 16, 2016 at 12:16 AM EDT.

There are also many potential solutions to the reproducibility crisis, Nelson said. One widely-held solution is changing the incentive structure of science. The incentive structure is the incentives ...