Particularized Pleading of Underlying Illegal Acts in the Second Circuit 8 minute read September 11, 2020. By. Steven Paradise. Matthew Catalano. Email. Share. Print. Photo via Shutterstock .

On . May 16, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Robins v.Spokeo, No. 13–1339, 578 U. S. ____ (2016), putting to rest months of speculation as to whether the ...

Officials contended that they were following the “particularized assessment” procedure laid out by the appeals court. The reduction would leave the CFPB with about 200 employees.

This blog post is the second in a series of posts that Baker & Hostetler LLP is devoting to the significant decision Robins v. Spokeo, No. 13-1339, 537 U.S. ___ (2016) (Spokeo). Monday’s post ...

In declarations to federal court, CFPB employees describe a hasty process to eliminate most of the agency's staff. "[A]ll that matters is the numbers," one employee said they were told by leaders.

The question is whether a party seeking to intervene as a plaintiff as a matter of right under Rule 24(a)(2) must show that he has standing to sue – that he has suffered a concrete, particularized, ...

If allowed to take effect, several divisions within the CFPB would be extremely reduced or eliminated under the RIF. For example, the 487-member Division of Supervision would lose 437 employees ...

The state’s highest court strengthened the right to privacy Wednesday, ruling that police who want to seize a cellphone cannot rely on a common-sense belief that criminals use cellphones to talk ...

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is terminating employees en masse after a court said they could only do so following a “particularized assessment.” ...

Reporting from San Francisco — Police agencies generally must tell the public the names of officers involved in shootings, the California Supreme Court decided Thursday. The state’s highest ...

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has ordered an immediate halt to the planned firings of nearly 1,500 employees at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and is ordering the Trump ...

It ruled that words printed on clothing do not warrant First Amendment protection unless they express a “particularized message,” and that the words “National Lawyers Guild Legal Observer” on the ...