News
Former Chief Justice John Marshall’s quote, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what ...
Few presidential powers are as consequential and enduring as the appointment of a judge to the Supreme Court of the United ...
From the beginning the Supreme Court has always been guided by the famous pronouncement by Chief Justice John Marshall in ...
In Dissent is a recurring series by Anastasia Boden on Supreme Court dissents that have shaped (or reshaped) our country. It was a case that sent one justice into a mental […] ...
As the Supreme Court headed into its summer break, the justices gave President Trump a big win, saying that district court ...
The Court’s opinion has disturbing things to say about privacy, but the biggest losers are likely to be judges themselves.
5dOpinion
AlterNet on MSNSupremes v. Democracy: How 7 of the Court's decisions brought fascism to America | OpinionThe decision in the case Trump v. CASA, Inc. did not seem momentous. It declared only that Federal District judges could no ...
The late former Supreme Court Justice David Souter was unusual in many ways, and we won’t see his like again. But we ...
The Supreme Court's 6-3 decision in Trump v. Casa limits federal judges' power to issue nationwide injunctions, allowing ...
SCOTUS gave President Donald Trump more power to impose his second-term agenda. How long will this judicially sanctioned ...
Justice Scalia's decade-old warnings about judicial overreach in Obergefell echo in President Trump's criticisms of judges who block his agenda through rulings.
With decisions from executive power to deportation authority, the conservative supermajority of the Supreme Court sided with President Trump most of the time.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results