9 小时
KTVX Salt Lake City on MSNSeparation of powers? Bill to create lawmaker panel for recommending judicial retentions ...A Utah House committee has advanced a bill that would allow a committee of lawmakers to recommend the retention of judges on ...
The Supreme Court's 7-member constitutional bench, led by Justice Aminuddin Khan, debated the legality of trying civilians ...
10 分钟Opinion
The New Republic on MSNThe Law’s Trump-Size Hole Is Suddenly ExposedThe judicial system has started to rule against the administration’s decimation of the civil service. If only it could ...
The accumulation of power in the same hands — whether elected or not — in the view of James Madison and others is the ...
The judge refused to grant Armaghan’s physical remand to the police and instead placed him in judicial custody.
Legal experts condemned the move, with one branding it a ‘fundamental failure’ in understanding the separation of powers, ...
2 小时on MSN
GOP Rep. Andrew Clyde spoke with Fox News Digital about drafting impeachment articles against Judge John McConnell and his ...
A ruling on court powers over arbitration could streamline dispute resolution—or flood the system with fresh litigation.
U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Prairie du Chien, has filed a resolution to impeach a federal judge who rejected President ...
19 小时Opinion
Tuko on MSNBBI Proposal on the Judicial Ombudsman Back to Haunt Those Who Opposed ItOffice of the Judicial Ombudsman was proposed under the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI), which was bitterly opposed by ...
21 小时
India Today on MSNWhy Supreme Court wants to protect high court judges from Lokpal scrutinyThe court’s stay on the Lokpal order asserting jurisdiction over HC judges has sparked a debate over anti-corruption ...
On Feb. 24, 1803, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it is the province of the courts — not the president, not the Congress — to say what the law is.
一些您可能无法访问的结果已被隐去。
显示无法访问的结果